Bioremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soil Using Engineered Bacterial Consortia

Authors

  • Zupancic M Department of Environmental Biotechnology, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia Author
  • Koskela S Department of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Author
  • Keller F Department of Soil Science, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22638236

Keywords:

bioremediation, heavy metals, bacterial consortia, genetic engineering, contaminated soil

Abstract

Background: Heavy metal contamination of agricultural and industrial soils is a persistent global problem, and engineered or
rationally assembled bacterial consortia are increasingly proposed as scalable alternatives to physicochemical remediation.
Objective: This review synthesises published evidence on the mechanisms, genetic engineering strategies, and field performance
of engineered bacterial consortia for heavy metal bioremediation of soil. Methods: A narrative review of peer-reviewed studies
identified via PubMed, Google Scholar, and Crossref, covering metal-resistance physiology, genetic engineering approaches
(surface display, metallothionein fusion, biosensor-linked operons), consortium design, and pilot/field trials. Findings: Native
resistance systems (efflux pumps, metallothioneins, extracellular polymeric substances) in strains such as Cupriavidus
metallidurans CH34 and Deinococcus radiodurans have been engineered to enhance sequestration of cadmium, lead, chromium,
mercury, and arsenic, with single-strain removal efficiencies of 68-95% reported under controlled conditions; multi-metal and
field settings typically show 20-40% lower performance. Rationally designed consortia exploiting division of labour and
plant-growth-promoting synergy improve robustness relative to monocultures. Conclusions: Engineered consortia hold real
promise for soil bioremediation, but reproducibility across metal mixtures, soil types, and scales remains the principal barrier to
deployment.

References

Valls M, de Lorenzo V (2002) Exploiting the genetic and biochemical capacities of bacteria for the remediation of heavy metal pollution. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26(4): 327-338.

Mahmoud AED, et al. (2023) Microorganisms for bioremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. Molecules/PMC 28.

Zhou Q, et al. (2025) Advances in microbial remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils: mechanisms, synergistic technologies, field applications and future perspectives. Frontiers/PMC.

Alves de Almeida M, et al. (2025) Immobilization of cadmium, lead, and copper in soil using bacteria: a literature review. Land 14(8): 1547.

Diep P, Mahadevan R, Yakunin AF (2018) Heavy metal removal by bioaccumulation using genetically engineered microorganisms. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 6: 157.

Tsoi R, Wu F, Zhang X, Bewick S, Karig D, You L (2019) Engineering microbial consortia by division of labor. Microbial Cell Factories 18: 1083.

Nwankwegu AS, et al. (2025) Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants. Environmental Sciences Europe 37: 45.

Kumar V, et al. (2024) Bioremediation of heavy metals-contaminated sites by microbial extracellular polymeric substances - a critical view. Total Environment Research Themes.

Priya A, et al. (2022) Microbial biofilms for environmental bioremediation of heavy metals: a review. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 194: 1701-1719.

Janssen PJ, Van Houdt R, Moors H, et al. (2010) The complete genome sequence of Cupriavidus metallidurans strain CH34, a master survivalist in harsh and anthropogenic environments. PLoS ONE 5(5): e10433.

Diels L, Van Houdt R, et al. (2021) Cupriavidus metallidurans CH34, a historical perspective on its discovery, characterization and metal resistance. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 97(2): fiaa247.

Brim H, McFarlan SC, Fredrickson JK, Minton KW, Zhai M, Wackett LP, Daly MJ (2000) Engineering Deinococcus radiodurans for metal remediation in radioactive mixed waste environments. Nature Biotechnology 18(1): 85-90.

Valls M, Atrian S, de Lorenzo V, Fernandez LA (2000) Engineering a mouse metallothionein on the cell surface of Ralstonia eutropha CH34 for immobilization of heavy metals in soil. Nature Biotechnology 18(6): 661-665.

Xu R, et al. (2020) Novel fusion protein consisting of metallothionein, cellulose binding module, and superfolder GFP for lead removal from the water decoction of traditional Chinese medicine. ACS Omega 5(6): 2893-2901.

Zhang Y, et al. (2020) Genetic engineering-facilitated coassembly of synthetic bacterial cells and magnetic nanoparticles for efficient heavy metal removal. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 12(28): 31316-31326.

Rahman MM, et al. (2026) Design and functional assessment of novel metallothionein in bacteria for cadmium and copper bioremediation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

Wei W, Liu X, Sun P, Wang X, Zhu H, Hong M, Mu Z, Liu J, Wang Y, Wang W (2014) Simple whole-cell biodetection and bioremediation of heavy metals based on an engineered lead-specific operon. Environmental Science & Technology 48(6): 3363-3371.

Chen Y, et al. (2019) Sensitive and specific whole-cell biosensor for arsenic detection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 85(11): e00694-19.

Sharma A, et al. (2024) Synthetic bacteria designed using ars operons: a promising solution for arsenic biosensing and bioremediation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 40: 130.

Kang CH, et al. (2023) Synthetic bacteria for the detection and bioremediation of heavy metals. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11: 1178680.

Ike A, Sriprang R, Ono H, Murooka Y, Yamashita M (2007) Bioremediation of cadmium contaminated soil using symbiosis between leguminous plant and recombinant rhizobia with the MTL4 and the PCS genes. Chemosphere 66(9): 1670-1676.

Ojuederie OB, Babalola OO (2022) Plant growth-promoting bacteria in metal-contaminated soil: current perspectives on remediation mechanisms. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 966226.

Backer R, et al. (2024) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation. Frontiers in Plant Science.

Kumar A, et al. (2025) Unleashing rhizobacteria for sustainable soil remediation: PGPR roles in heavy metal tolerance, detoxification, and plant productivity. Frontiers in Microbiology.

Ma Y, et al. (2019) Effective bioremediation of heavy metal-contaminated landfill soil through bioaugmentation using consortia of fungi. Journal of Soils and Sediments 19: 3866-3875.

Silva C, et al. (2026) Development of a synthetic microbial community for multi-metal bioremediation: growth, morphology, and nutrient homeostasis. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances.

Kumari S, et al. (2022) Practical limitations of bioaugmentation in treating heavy metal contaminated soil and role of plant growth promoting bacteria in phytoremediation as a promising alternative approach. Heliyon 8(4): e09253.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-21